Before 20.109, my writing experience had almost exclusively
been in writing essays, book summaries, stories, and similar types of papers.
Every writing assignment I’d had previously had exclusively focused on the
content of the essay itself. I had never had any written assignment where the
title of the paper was even slightly considered as part of the grade. I guess
it’s a pretty small component of the work we’ve done in 20.109, but it’s one
that I’ve found to be particularly interesting. Coming in to the class, I had
anticipated much of the lab work and the types of writing we’ve done, but I had
never considered putting so much thought into creating a title. It’s an
interesting and completely new idea to me – having to basically “market” my
work to a target audience.
As interesting as I find this component of the data summary
and the figures we’ve created or edited so far, it’s not easy or intuitive to
me. I have a hard time summarizing an entire paper, and making people actually
interested in reading the paper in full – in about one sentence worth of words.
I had enough trouble titling figures on individual homework assignments, so
working with Hunter to come up with a title for our data summary was certainly
time consuming. We spent a good chunk of time coming up with the first
sentences that came to our minds that would at least sort of summarize our data
summary. Eventually, we found one that we were fairly satisfied with, and wrote
it down. Then came the stage where we practically needed to analyze the title
one word at a time, making sure the title made clear everything we wanted to promote
about the paper, but was not overwhelming or cluttered. We finally came up with
something we thought summed up the main points of the paper, and submitted the
data summary draft.
Okay, so that was done, right? Nope. A week or so later we
started round two: the revision. After we finished revising everything else, it
was time to tackle the title. We started by looking at our previous title: Was
this part here too specific? Maybe the wording over there wasn’t specific
enough. How can we change this phrasing?
At first, we continued our same strategy of going through
the title, word by word, and making tiny changes. After a while, the title had
changed very little, and we realized we needed a new approach. It was time to write
a new title, completely from scratch. We started differently this time though.
This time, we started by writing a massive sentence that described everything
we could possibly consider including in our title. Next, we narrowed down what
information was absolutely crucial to understanding the purpose of the paper. We
reviewed several points: Which parts of this current title are interesting to
our target audiences? Does this part of the sentence give the absolutely
necessary details of our experiment? Does our title show readers why our
results are impactful or significant? After that, we removed all unnecessary
words and phrases. Done.
This process was significantly faster than our previous
method, and I felt that I had a much clearer reasoning for why we wrote the
title exactly as we had, and why it would make the paper seem intriguing to our
parties of interest. I learned what works for me in terms of creating a title
by trying another, less effective, method first.
Writing the title isn’t the only part of the data summary we
needed to consider extensively. The abstract presents another, possibly more
difficult, challenge for me. Unlike the title, we needed to include a bit more
than the bare minimum to know what the paper discusses, but we needed to avoid
virtually rewriting the paper within the abstract. This balance was difficult
for me to work out, but I personally found more success when I went through and
considered how each individual sentence contributed to the goal of the
abstract.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that 20.109 has helped me learn
to evaluate what information is crucial to gain the attention of the intended
audience, and what information is excessive. And I’m glad I learned by trying
different methods, and struggling.
No comments:
Post a Comment